Pension
Trends Volume VII, No. 2, May 2006
Download/view PDF version
|
Join/Leave Email List
In this issue...
| Join our Pension Trends email list to receive future issues via email | |
| For previous issues of Pension Trends, visit the Pension Trends archive. |
Accounting for Responsibility – GASB 43 & 45
|
Author Profile |
||
|
Alan J. Stonewall This article was written by Alan J.
Stonewall, FSPA, EA, MAAA. Mr. Stonewall is a former president of
the American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries and former
chairman of the Actuarial Standards Board. He is a current board
member of the Actuarial Foundation. |
||
One way or another, we
are all going to be affected by the financial reporting requirement of
Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statements 43 and 45. Most of us
will be impacted only by the financial consequences it will have on our towns,
cities, fire and school districts and similar government entities – financial
consequences meaning additional pressure on tax revenues.
Until now, state and local employers have not had to account for the financial
obligations created by health care, long-term care, life insurance and similar
benefit programs offered to retirees. GASB does not require that these benefit
programs be funded, but it does require that public employers actuarially value
and disclose their unfunded liabilities associated with the programs. Because
bond rating agencies are likely to take unfunded liabilities into account when
assessing a public employer’s financial condition, the landscape for how these
programs are managed is going to change.
For starters, we expect pre-funding to become more common. GASB offers
significant advantages for funding these benefit obligations. Additionally, in
the long run, pre-funding will reduce the amount of tax dollars ultimately
needed to fund the benefits, which is one reason why retirement plans have
pre-funded their benefit obligations for decades.
Another change is potentially more significant. Most public employers are going
to find new GASB liabilities to be shockingly high. In many instances, we expect
the annual expense a local government will have to book will be twenty (or more)
times greater than the current expense for their retiree benefit programs. What
was a $100,000 annual expense will under GASB become a $2,000,000 hit. This may
cause some governments to consider reducing retiree benefits or, where law
permits, eliminating some retiree benefits altogether. Time will tell.
In the interim, the first step is for public employers to get a handle on the
size of their potential new GASB liabilities. The new disclosure rules under
GASB will be phased in over the next few years. Large employers (determined by
revenue) must comply as early as 2007.
Many employers may have a retiree medical program without even realizing it. One
common feature of government-sponsored health plans is to allow retirees to
remain on the active health plan until they are eligible for Medicare, with the
retiree paying the entire premium. No cost to the employer, right? Wrong, says
GASB. These types of plans must account for the benefit as if the retiree group
was separately rated from the active group, in which case the premium would be
much higher. From this standpoint, the retiree may be paying only half of the
true "cost" of coverage, leaving a significant obligation with the employer.
According to one published estimate, nationally there are 85,000 to 95,000
states, cities, and school districts that will be affected. This is a staggering
number, and doesn’t even include all the other types of local government
entities such as fire and water districts. GASB does offer a "simplified" (but
still daunting) approach for valuing benefit programs for very small public
employers, but other public employers will be required to engage a qualified
actuary to go through a rigorous valuation process to determine the value of
their unfunded liabilities. Once the liabilities are known, the next step will
be to develop a long-term strategy for how to best manage the liabilities.
Taking into account the time it takes to build and find funding for public
employer budgets there should be a sense of urgency. At IAI we certainly feel
that way. We are gearing up for what we expect to be a significant new line of
business for us. We have added staff capabilities and established procedures and
methodologies for doing GASB 43 and 45 work. As I said at the start of this
article, one way or another we will all be impacted by the new GASB
requirements. At IAI we expect the impact to be direct, significant, and
happening soon.
Beginning of Article | Table of Contents
This newsletter has been published in order to share general information with our professional contacts. The information presented in this newsletter should not be acted upon without first seeking the advice of a CPA, attorney or other benefit professional.